Review



cd86  (R&D Systems)


Bioz Verified Symbol R&D Systems is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol R&D Systems manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 91
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    R&D Systems cd86
    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or <t>CD86</t> was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .
    Cd86, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd86/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd86 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    91/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "Lack of blocking activity in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies reduces toxicity, but not anti-tumor efficacy"

    Article Title: Lack of blocking activity in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies reduces toxicity, but not anti-tumor efficacy

    Journal: bioRxiv

    doi: 10.1101/2021.07.12.452090

    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or CD86 was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .
    Figure Legend Snippet: A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or CD86 was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .

    Techniques Used: Blocking Assay, Binding Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Incubation, Control, Mutagenesis, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Residue, Cell Based Assay

    Top panel: Ipilimumab blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86, which allows antigen presenting cells (APCs) to co-stimulate peripheral Tregs enhancing their proliferation. GIGA-564 weakly blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86 and thus induces less Treg proliferation. Bottom panel: Ipilimumab and GIGA-564 bind CTLA-4 on intratumoral Tregs to induce Treg killing via interactions with Fc receptor (FcR) on effector cells. GIGA-564 induces stronger FcR signaling and thus more efficiently depletes intratumoral Tregs than ipilimumab.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Top panel: Ipilimumab blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86, which allows antigen presenting cells (APCs) to co-stimulate peripheral Tregs enhancing their proliferation. GIGA-564 weakly blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86 and thus induces less Treg proliferation. Bottom panel: Ipilimumab and GIGA-564 bind CTLA-4 on intratumoral Tregs to induce Treg killing via interactions with Fc receptor (FcR) on effector cells. GIGA-564 induces stronger FcR signaling and thus more efficiently depletes intratumoral Tregs than ipilimumab.

    Techniques Used:



    Similar Products

    cd86  (R&D Systems)
    91
    R&D Systems cd86
    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or <t>CD86</t> was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .
    Cd86, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cd86/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cd86 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    91/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    human b7-2/cd86/his tag (10699-h08h)  (Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd)
    90
    Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd human b7-2/cd86/his tag (10699-h08h)
    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or <t>CD86</t> was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .
    Human B7 2/Cd86/His Tag (10699 H08h), supplied by Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/human b7-2/cd86/his tag (10699-h08h)/product/Sinobio Chemistry Co Ltd
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    human b7-2/cd86/his tag (10699-h08h) - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    b7 2 his tag  (R&D Systems)
    91
    R&D Systems b7 2 his tag
    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or <t>CD86</t> was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .
    B7 2 His Tag, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 91/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/b7 2 his tag/product/R&D Systems
    Average 91 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    b7 2 his tag - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
    91/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or CD86 was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Lack of blocking activity in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies reduces toxicity, but not anti-tumor efficacy

    doi: 10.1101/2021.07.12.452090

    Figure Lengend Snippet: A. The ability of CTLA-4 mAbs to block binding of CD80 or CD86 was measured using a plate-based ELISA method. CTLA-4 was used to coat the plate, then after the antibody samples were incubated, His-tagged CD80 or CD86 was added, and the amount of ligand able to bind to CTLA-4 was measured. Blocking mAbs that prevent CD80 or CD86 from binding to CTLA-4 reduce the absorbance signal due to lack of CD80 or CD86 binding to CTLA-4. Weak-blocking mAbs still allow CD80 or CD86 to bind, preventing the loss of all absorbance signal. B. Plots show the ability of GIGA-564 to block the interaction between CTLA-4 and the B7 ligands CD80 and CD86 compared to ipilimumab and CTLA-4.28, as assessed by ELISA as described in (A). Absorbance values were normalized to an anti-PD-1 control (pembrolizumab) and displayed as the average of two technical replicates. C-D. The key residues mediating CTLA-4 binding were identified for GIGA-564 and ipilimumab by shotgun mutagenesis of CTLA-4, followed by staining and flow cytometry assessment of binding. C. Shown is the crystal structure (Protein Database [PDB] 1I8L) of the complex between CD80 (blue) and CTLA-4 (gray) on which the CTLA-4 epitope residues shared between ipilimumab and GIGA-564 were colored orange and the key differentiating residue R70 was colored red (visualized with Pymol). Additionally, G142 was identified as a secondary residue for the epitope of ipilimumab but not GIGA-564. D. Table showing key amino acids on CTLA-4 of interest for these epitopes; those found by mutational analysis to be important for binding of CTLA-4 to CD80 or CD86 in a cell-based assay are marked in gray to indicate the epitope residues for those proteins .

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human His-tagged CD80 (R&D Systems 9050-B1, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or CD86 (R&D Systems 9090-B2, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was then added to the plates at 1 μg/mL.

    Techniques: Blocking Assay, Binding Assay, Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay, Incubation, Control, Mutagenesis, Staining, Flow Cytometry, Residue, Cell Based Assay

    Top panel: Ipilimumab blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86, which allows antigen presenting cells (APCs) to co-stimulate peripheral Tregs enhancing their proliferation. GIGA-564 weakly blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86 and thus induces less Treg proliferation. Bottom panel: Ipilimumab and GIGA-564 bind CTLA-4 on intratumoral Tregs to induce Treg killing via interactions with Fc receptor (FcR) on effector cells. GIGA-564 induces stronger FcR signaling and thus more efficiently depletes intratumoral Tregs than ipilimumab.

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Lack of blocking activity in anti-CTLA-4 antibodies reduces toxicity, but not anti-tumor efficacy

    doi: 10.1101/2021.07.12.452090

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Top panel: Ipilimumab blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86, which allows antigen presenting cells (APCs) to co-stimulate peripheral Tregs enhancing their proliferation. GIGA-564 weakly blocks CTLA-4 interaction with CD80/CD86 and thus induces less Treg proliferation. Bottom panel: Ipilimumab and GIGA-564 bind CTLA-4 on intratumoral Tregs to induce Treg killing via interactions with Fc receptor (FcR) on effector cells. GIGA-564 induces stronger FcR signaling and thus more efficiently depletes intratumoral Tregs than ipilimumab.

    Article Snippet: Recombinant human His-tagged CD80 (R&D Systems 9050-B1, Minneapolis, MN, USA) or CD86 (R&D Systems 9090-B2, Minneapolis, MN, USA) was then added to the plates at 1 μg/mL.

    Techniques: